<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Accurate Are Government Debt Statistics?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/economics/how-accurate-are-government-debt-statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/economics/how-accurate-are-government-debt-statistics/</link>
	<description>Economics Blog - current events and economics essays</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:11:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shuhuraab</title>
		<link>http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/economics/how-accurate-are-government-debt-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-1345</link>
		<dc:creator>shuhuraab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/?p=642#comment-1345</guid>
		<description>you should be thank full for it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you should be thank full for it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tejvan</title>
		<link>http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/economics/how-accurate-are-government-debt-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>tejvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/?p=642#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>Thanks for Comment, Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for Comment, Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert mcdowell</title>
		<link>http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/economics/how-accurate-are-government-debt-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-1335</link>
		<dc:creator>robert mcdowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/?p=642#comment-1335</guid>
		<description>National Debt is a Central Government number for outstanding Government bonds, which are securities of more than 1 year maturity i.e. excluding money market treasury bills, which are of less than 1 year maturity. National Debt may in some countries exclude local government debt and Government guaranteed agency debt. Within National Debt a large percentage (typically 15% - 30%) represents funds owed by one arm of government to another i.e. money owed by government to itself, called non-tradable government bonds. The idea of adding future liabilities such as public pensions to a current National Debt figure is silly. Public pensions are funded out of current tax income and have a low net cost. All Government spending has a same year net cost of 70% or less, and much less over 2-4 years. In the case of pensions, government comfortably funds this out of all tax income from all pensioners i.e. rich pensioners pay for poor pensioners and the pension is akin to a tax discount for the 70% of pensioners who pay tax and who are the wealthiest household segment. Economists should never look at these questions in merely a two-dimensional way. This, however, is what the Institute for Fiscal Studies may be accused of - playing politics, not economics!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National Debt is a Central Government number for outstanding Government bonds, which are securities of more than 1 year maturity i.e. excluding money market treasury bills, which are of less than 1 year maturity. National Debt may in some countries exclude local government debt and Government guaranteed agency debt. Within National Debt a large percentage (typically 15% &#8211; 30%) represents funds owed by one arm of government to another i.e. money owed by government to itself, called non-tradable government bonds. The idea of adding future liabilities such as public pensions to a current National Debt figure is silly. Public pensions are funded out of current tax income and have a low net cost. All Government spending has a same year net cost of 70% or less, and much less over 2-4 years. In the case of pensions, government comfortably funds this out of all tax income from all pensioners i.e. rich pensioners pay for poor pensioners and the pension is akin to a tax discount for the 70% of pensioners who pay tax and who are the wealthiest household segment. Economists should never look at these questions in merely a two-dimensional way. This, however, is what the Institute for Fiscal Studies may be accused of &#8211; playing politics, not economics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
