EU Growth and Stability Pact

Hello i was just going over my notes and was finding it diffcult to find out about the growth and stability pact can you please help as i do not no which bits are relevent and which are not

  • Growth and Stability Pact is a part of Monetary Union.
  • Countries who join the Euro are supposed to sign up to the Growth and Stability Pact
  • Basically it means that Governments cannot borrow more than 3% of GDP. i.e. A countries budget Deficit should not be more than a certain amount
  • The rationale is that joining the single currency means a common interest rate, set by the ECB. If countries borrow too much it puts upward pressure on interest rates. Therefore, limits on government borrowing are needed to avoid these problems
Problems of Growth and Stability Pact

  • It means countries have less flexibility in dealing with economic downturns. In a recession it makes sense to have expansionary fiscal policy. (higher spending and lower taxes) However, this increases the budget deficit. Therefore, to keep government borrowing within the criteria of the growth and stability pact means that the government cannot try and increase AD through fiscal policy.
  • It is worth noting in the EURO a country cannot change interest rates, therefore fiscal policy becomes more important
  • Many countries have simply chosen to ignore it. This includes France and Germany. As the EU cannot really enforce the growth and stability pact, its impact is obviously lessened.
See also:

Labels:

Perma Link | By: T Pettinger | Tuesday, June 5, 2007
Subscribe to future posts | 1 Comments Links to this post

Question on UK Joining Euro

Reader's Question


If the UK were to enter the EMU at this stage, interest rates would fall and this could cause inflation?"


Current interest rates for the Eurozone are 3.75%.

The interest rate for the whole Eurozone is set by the ECB European Central Bank in Frankfurt. (1)

UK interest rates are currently 5.25% (2)

If the UK were to join the Euro we would have the same interest rate as the Eurozone area. Monetary Union involves a Common Monetary policy - interest rates set by ECB. Therefore interest rates would fall by 1.5%. This would be good news for those with mortgage payments. However if interest rates were to fall by 1.5% it would increase consumer spending and therefore could cause inflation.

Lower interest rates would have a big impact on the UK because we have high levels of debt. It would also have a big impact on the UK housing market. Lower interest rates are likely to increase the housing boom, which is not desirable given the already high levels of high prices.

See also:

Why UK will never join EURO


Costs of Joining Euro

Labels: ,

Perma Link | By: T Pettinger | Sunday, April 15, 2007
Subscribe to future posts | 0 Comments Links to this post

Economic Problems of European Union

Despite a recent improvement in EU growth (last year GDP growth was 2.9%) there are concerns over fundamental problems with the EU economy. In recent years by far the worst performers in the EU have been the big 3 of Germany, Italy and France. Germany for example has experienced 6 years of sluggish growth and poor productivity rates. The OECD estimates that productivity growth in the EU has averaged only 1.5%, which is lower than comparative rates in the US.


Reasons for the Slowdown In European growth

  1. Some slowdown inevitable after wonder years of 1950s and 1960s. 50 years ago, as the Treaty of Rome was being signed, the German economy was undergoing a period of tremendous growth, combined with low inflation and low unemployment. To some extent a slowdown from this rapid expansion is a reflection of a maturing economy. However this is only a partial explanation.

  2. German Reunification. This has often been used to explain low growth in Germany and hence EU. Reunification was very expensive causing high levels of government borrowing. Because of high borrowing levels interest rates were higher than they needed to be. This was certainly a constraint on German growth in the 1990s however 17 years after the fall of the Berlin wall this is becoming increasingly less significant.

  3. The EURO. In particular it is argued that Germany joined the Euro at a rate that is too high making its exports less competitive. Other countries are also experiencing declining competitiveness as a result of a strong EURO. Italy has managed growth of only 1.3% since joining the EURO. Spain has a current account deficit of 8.5% of GDP; a reflection of poor competitiveness.

  4. ECB is too concerned with low inflation The ECB has been accused of giving too much priority to the goal of low inflation. It is argued they have sought to maintain low inflation at the expense of lower growth. Note their target is less than 2% rather than 2% +/-1 as in UK

  5. Growth and Stability Pact. This is a constraint on expansionary fiscal policy because in theory it limits governments borrowing to 3% of GDP. Therefore in a recession a government is unable to use monetary policy (ECB set rates for whole Euro zone) but also they are unable to reflate the economy through higher spending and borrowing. However in practise these rules have proved to be sufficiently flexible; there has been no attempt to penalise countries like France and Italy who have broken them.

  6. Inflexible Labour Markets. This is frequently held up as a constraint on economic growth. In particular rigidities in the labour market discourage investment from abroad. For example in France there are laws which makes it difficult to fire workers once they are hired. This discourages firms from expanding and investing. Both the IMF and OECD have argued that further labour market liberalisation is needed to regain competitiveness. Even many of the European leaders acknowledge it is a necessity. However such reforms often face stiff opposition from powerful interest groups who wish to protect the interests of their members. Thus reform has proved very difficult and exceedingly slow. As Luxembourg’s Mr Juncker once said.
    We all know what to do, we just don’t know how to get re-elected after we’ve done it.”

  7. Demographic Changes. Countries like Germany and Italy have a declining birth rate. This means that the population structure is becoming weighted towards those who are over 50. The traditional population pyramid is being inverted. The increased demands placed on benefits and decline in tax revenue is a serious burden for government spending. It is reflected in burgeoning public debt. As of 2006 Italy’s public debt stood at 105%. German and France just below 70% of GDP. Such high levels of debt are argued to cause crowding out of private sector spending. Unfortunately this problem is likely to be exacerbated as the 1960s baby boomers retire. Again there is much opposition to the reform of generous state pensions.

See also:

References

Labels: ,

Perma Link | By: T Pettinger | Saturday, March 17, 2007
Subscribe to future posts | 0 Comments Links to this post

Gordon Brown's 5 Economic Test for Joining Euro

As Gordon Brown approaches his last budget as chancellor many are reviewing his tenure as Chancellor and evaluating his success or failure. One important contribution he made was to steer the UK away from joining the Euro on the ground that "it would not be in Britain's economic interest". The justification for this was based on his 5 economics tests.


Before deciding whether the UK should join the Euro the Chancellor, Gordon Brown drew up 5 economic tests which the UK must pass for the UK to join. The main principle behind these 5 economic tests was whether the UK would cope with a common monetary policy. The 5 tests are in some ways superfluous. The main test being is really whether the UK has a degree of economic harmonisation with the rest of Europe.

5 Economic Tests for Joining the Euro

  1. Economic Harmonisation.

    The UK economy must be harmonised with the Euro zone. If the UK economy was growing much faster than EU then UK interest rates would need to be higher. For example, at the moment if the UK joined interest rates would fall and this may cause inflation. Therefore it is essential that the UK has a similar economic cycle to Europe. Even if there is temporary harmonisation there is no guarantee it will continue on a permanent basis.

  2. Is there sufficient Flexibility?

    If the UK went into recession could it be able to cope? It would have no influence over Monetary policy but also Fiscal policy is limited by the growth and stability pact. This limits the amount of government borrowing and therefore limits the scope for expansionary fiscal policy.

  3. Effect on Investment.

    Would joining the euro create better conditions for firms making long-term decisions to invest in Britain? UK inward Investment has not suffered since the UK decided not to join

  4. Effect on Financial services.

    What impact would entry into the euro have on the UK's financial services industry? London as a financial centre has boomed in recent years.

  5. Effect on Growth and Jobs

    Would joining the euro promote higher growth, stability and a lasting increase in jobs? There is no clear evidence that it would. UK economy has done better outside the Euro than in the Euro.

At the moment the weight of economic opinion is that the UK is better off not joining the Euro. One important factor is that the UK housing market is very sensitive to interest rates. Many UK householders are homeowners and also many mortgages are variable. Therefore the cost of mortgages fluctuates with changes in the base rate. Thus a small change in European interest rates could potentially have a damaging effect on UK economy. For example, if the UK was to join now, interest rates would fall causing a potentially harmful inflationary boom.


See also:

Labels: , ,

Perma Link | By: T Pettinger | Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Subscribe to future posts | 3 Comments Links to this post

Why the UK will never join the EURO.

From a political perspective the UK has always been reluctant to submerge itself in a European identity. The EU, with its prescriptions on the shape and size of bananas,(1) remains an easy target for UK tabloids and satirists. The idea of giving up the £ for a nondescript EURO would hardly make for a populist political agenda. However, political arguments aside, there is increasingly little if any support for the EURO, even from a purely economic point of view.

Firstly the supposed benefits of joining the EURO are becoming increasingly marginal.

1. Exchange Rate Stability. A main advantage of joining the Euro is that it reduces exchange rate volatility with our main EU trading partners. However since 2003 the £ has displayed very little exchange rate volatility. In this article. Stephen King, Chief Economist at HSBC claims that in effect the UK has already in effect joined the Euro. Anyway it is also relatively easy to insure against exchange rate movements through the purchase of currency on the open markets. Therefore at the moment there is little risk associated with exchange rate fluctuations.

2. Inward Investment.
Inward Investment has continued to soar even outside the EURO. It was thought joining the EURO was necessary to attract sufficient inward investment. However it appears that a separate currency has not been a deterrent to further inward investment. See: Inward investment in UK

3. Low inflation. There was a time when the UK was known as the “sick man of Europe” its economy characterised by, boom and bust cycles and high inflation. It was thought that joining the EURO would give the UK a strong anti inflation framework. However since the MPC was given independence in 1997 inflation has remained close to the government’s target of 2%. Furthermore this low inflation has been consistent with an enviably high growth rate. When your economy is outperforming the Euro Zone there seems little reason to join.

Joining the Euro would give the UK a small gain in terms of lower transaction costs and greater exchange rate stability. However it must be emphasised for many businesses, both domestic and foreign, these costs are a small % of total costs. However many economists fear that joining the Euro could lead to some significant economic problems.

Disadvantages of Joining Euro



1. Loss of Independent Monetary Policy. On joining the EURO interest rates would no longer be set by the MPC. They would be set by the European Central Bank. The ECB look at the whole EURO economy and not what is best for the UK. Thus if the UK joined now interest rates would fall from 5.25% to the ECB rate of 2.25%. This fall in interest rates could cause and further boost the buoyant Housing Market and cause future inflationary pressures.

2. Difficulty in getting out of a recession.
On the other hand if the UK suffered a recession they would be unable to cut interest rates. It would be difficult to boost demand and get out of the recession. To an extent this occurred in 1992; the UK was in a recession but because they were in the ERM (2) they were trying to maintain a high value of the £. Thus interest rates were far too high (15%) these high interest rates exacerbated the UK’s recession.

3. Sensitivity to interest Rates. The nature of the UK housing market means the UK economy is sensitive to changes in interest rates. Unlike European countries most UK householders own their own house, their variable mortgage is a high % of their income. Thus even a 0.25% change in interest rate can significantly affect disposable income. If the UK were to join now and interest rates were to fall by 2% it would very likely cause a further boom in the housing market which would feed through into higher inflation.

4. Loss of independence of Fiscal Policy. The growth and stability pact limits the levels of government borrowing to 3% of GDP. This is another difficulty in getting the economy out of a recession. However it would not affect the UK at the moment. Also France and Germany have conveniently been able to sidestep this rule when necessity demanded.

The UK economy is doing relatively well, by historical standards the UK economic performance is quite remarkable. Thus there seems little incentive for a British politician to take on the entrenched Euro scepticism prevalent in British media and society. There is little to be gained by joining and there are many potential problems, the Queen’s head is safe for the foreseeable future.


By: R.Pettinger

See also:

Benefits of Joining EURO

Costs of Joining Euro


(1) This is actually a myth. The EU never had a regulation about the shape of bananas, but the point is it has entered British folklore.

Labels: ,

Perma Link | By: T Pettinger | Thursday, March 1, 2007
Subscribe to future posts | 9 Comments Links to this post