Mercantilism is an economic theory and practise where the government seeks to regulate the economy and trade in order to promote domestic industry – often at the expense of other countries. Mercantilism is associated with policies which restrict imports and foster domestic industries.
Mercantilism stands in contrast to the theory of free trade – which argues countries economic well-being can be best improved through the reduction of tariffs and fair free trade.
- Restrictions on imports – tariff barriers, quotas or non-tariff barriers.
- Accumulation of foreign currency reserves, plus gold and silver reserves. (also known as bullionism) In the sixteenth/seventeenth century, it was believed that the accumulation of gold reserves (at the expense of other countries) was the best way to increase the prosperity of a country.
- Granting of state monopolies to particular firms especially those associated with trade and shipping.
- Subsidies of export industries to give competitive advantage in global markets.
- Government investment in research and development to maximise efficiency and capacity of the domestic industry.
- Allowing copyright/intellectual theft from foreign companies.
- Limiting wages and consumption of the working classes to enable greater profits to stay with the merchant class.
- Control of colonies, e.g. making colonies buy from Empire country and taking control of colonies wealth.
Examples of mercantilism
- England Navigation Act of 1651 prohibited foreign vessels engaging in coastal trade.
- All colonial exports to Europe had to pass through England first and then be re-exported to Europe.
- Under the British Empire, India was restricted in buying from domestic industries and were forced to import salt from the UK. Protests against this salt tax led to the ‘Salt tax revolt’ led by Gandhi.
- In seventeenth-century France, the state promoted a controlled economy with strict regulations about the economy and labour markets
- Rise of protectionist policies following the great depression; countries sought to reduce imports and also reduce the value of the currency by leaving the gold standard.
- Some have accused China of mercantilism due to industrial policies which have led to an oversupply of industrial production – combined with a policy of undervaluing the currency.
- However, the extent of mercantilist policies are disputed – See – Is China Mercantilist? NBER
In the modern world, mercantilism is sometimes associated with policies, such as:
- Undervaluation of currency. e.g. government buying foreign currency assets to keep the exchange rate undervalued and make exports more competitive. A criticism often levelled at China.
- Government subsidy of industry for unfair advantage. Again China has been accused of offering state supported subsidies for industry, leading to over supply of industries such as steel – meaning other countries struggle to compete.
- A surge of protectionist sentiment, e.g. US tariffs on Chinese imports, and US policies to ‘Buy American.’
- Copyright theft
Criticisms of Mercantilism
- Adam Smith’s “The Wealth of Nations” (1776) – argued for benefits of free trade and criticised the inefficiency of monopoly.
- Theory of comparative advantage (David Ricardo)
- Mercantilism is a philosophy of a zero-sum game – where people benefit at the expense of others. It is not a philosophy for increasing global growth and reducing global problems. Also, increasing other peoples wealth can lead to selfish benefits, e.g. growth of other countries, increases markets for our exports. Trying to impoverish other countries will harm our own growth and prosperity.
- Mercantilism which stresses government regulation and monopoly tends to lead to inefficiency and corruption.
- Mercantilism justified Empire building and the poverty of colonies to enrich the Empire country.
- Mercantilism leads to tit for tat policies – high tariffs on imports leads to retaliation.
- The growth of globalisation and free trade during the post-war period showed possibilities from opening markets and respecting other countries as equal players.
- Economies of scale from specialisation possible under free trade.
Justification for neo-mercantilism
Despite many criticisms of mercantilism, there are arguments to support the restriction of free trade in certain circumstances.
- Tariffs in response to domestic subsidies. Supporters argue that since China’s steel is effectively subsidised leading to a glut in supply, it is necessary and fair to impose tariffs on imports of Chinese steel to protect domestic producers from unfair competition. US tariffs on imports of steel from China 266%. In Europe, tariffs are 13%.
- Protection against dumping. If some countries have an excess supply of goods, they can sell at a very low price to get rid of the surplus. But, this can make domestic firms unprofitable. Protectionism can be justified to protect against this dumping. Examples, include EEC dumping excess agricultural production on world agricultural markets and China’s dumping of steel.
- Infant industry argument. For countries seeking to diversify their economy, tariffs may be justified to try and develop new industries. When the industries have developed and benefited from economies of scale, then the tariffs and protectionism can be dropped.