Readers Question: Could you differentiate between micro economics and macro economics?
- Microeconomics is the study of particular markets, and segments of the economy. It looks at issues such as consumer behaviour, individual labour markets, and the theory of firms.
- Macro economics is the study of the whole economy. It looks at ‘aggregate’ variables, such as aggregate demand, national output and inflation.
Micro economics is concerned with:
- Supply and demand in individual markets
- Individual consumer behaviour. e.g. Consumer choice theory
- Individual labour markets – e.g. demand for labour, wage determination
- Externalities arising from production and consumption.
Macro economics is concerned with
- Monetary / fiscal policy. e.g. what effect does interest rates have on whole economy?
- Reasons for inflation, and unemployment
- Economic Growth
- International trade and globalisation
- Reasons for differences in living standards and economic growth between countries.
- Government borrowing
Moving from Micro to Macro
If we look at a simple supply and demand diagram for motor cars. Microeconomics is concerned with issues such as the impact of an increase in demand for cars.
This micro economic analysis shows that the increased demand leads to higher price, and higher quantity.
Macro economic analysis
This looks at all goods and services produced in the economy.
The macro diagram is looking at Real GDP (which is the total amount of output produced in the economy) instead of quantity.
Instead of the price of a good, we are looking at the overall price level (PL) for the economy. Inflation measures the annual % change in the aggregate price level.
Macro diagrams are based on the same principles as micro diagrams, we just look at Real GDP rather than Quantity and Inflation rather than Price Level (PL)
We can also consider differences between micro and macro economics. I will summarise the main differences here:
- Small segment of economy vs whole aggregate economy.
- Microeconomics works on principle that markets soon create equilibrium. In macro economics, the economy may be in a state of disequilibrium (boom or recession) for a longer period
- There is little debate about the basic principles of micro-economics. Macro economics is more contentious. There are different schools of macro economics offering different explanations (e.g. Keynesian, Monetarist, Austrian, Real Business cycle e.t.c).
- Macro economics places greater emphasis on empirical data and trying to explain it. Micro economics tends to work from theory first.
Differences Between Microeconomics and Macroeconomics
The main difference is that micro looks at small segments, and macro looks at the whole economy. But, there are other differences.
Equilibrium – Disequilibrium
Classical economic analysis assumes that markets return to equilibrium (S=D). If demand increases faster than supply, this causes price to rise and firms respond by increasing supply. For a long time, it was assumed that the macro economy behaved in the same way as micro economic analysis. Before, the 1930s, there wasn’t really a separate branch of economics called macroeconomics.
Great Depression and Birth of Macroeconomics
In the 1930s, economies were clearly not in equilibrium. There was high unemployment, output was below capacity, and there was a state of disequilbrium. Classical economics didn’t really have an explanation for this dis-equilibrium, which from a micro perspective, shouldn’t occur.
In 1936, J.M.Keynes produced his The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, this examined why the depression was lasting so long. It examined why we can be in a state of disequilibrium in the macro economy. Keynes observed that we can have a negative output gap (disequilibrium in the macroeconomy) for a prolonged time. In other words, microeconomic principles of markets clearing, didn’t necessarily apply to macro economics. Keynes wasn’t the only economist to investigate this new branch of economics. For example, Iriving Fisher examined the role of debt deflation in explaining the great depression. But, Keynes’ theory was the most wide ranging explanation, and played a large role in creating the new branch of macro-economics.
Since 1936, macroeconomics developed as a separate strand within economics. There have been competing explanations for issues such as inflation, recessions and economic growth.
Similarities between Microeconomics and Macroeconomics
Although it is convenient to split up economics into two branches – microeconomics and macroeconomics, it is to some extent an artificial divide.
- Micro principles used in macro economics. If you study impact of devaluation, you are likely to use same economic principles, such as the elasticity of demand to changes in price.
- Micro effects macro economics and vice versa. If we see a rise in oil prices, this will have a significant impact on cost-push inflation. If technology reduces costs, this enables faster economic growth.
- Blurring of distinction. If house prices rise, this is a micro economic effect for housing market. But, housing market is so influential that it could also be considered a macro-economic variable, and will influence monetary policy.
- There have been efforts to use computer models of household behaviour to predict impact on macro economy.
- Micro and macro economics at IMF