Ask an Economic Question

You are welcome to ask any questions on Economics. Though you might also like to try google custom search (top right) to see if the topic has been covered before.

I am looking to explain economic principles / ideas/ recent developments in economics. I can’t promise to answer, but will try if it meets the criteria below.

  • Please don’t ask me to do your coursework / assignment e.t.c. (I can usually tell if it is a homework question!)
  • Please don’t ask any maths calculations.
  • The question and answer will be published here so that everyone can see it (including your teacher!)
  • I aim to try and simplify economics; as a rough guide, I would aim at an understanding similar to a good British A Level student.
  • I am looking to explain economic principles/ideas/ recent developments in economics.
  •  I will answer as a new post, if you leave email address, I’ll usually send quick email. Check home page of blog for new post. With question and answers

Add comment at bottom of post.

mail(at)econoimcshelp.org

2,583 thoughts on “Ask an Economic Question”

  1. Would expansionary fiscal policies be more effective for a large open economy such as USA
    compared to a closed economy such as Russia or a small open economy such as Singapore?

  2. explain the five basic point on the indifference curves of the ordinalist utility analysis.

  3. I don’t have a question, but i do have a couple suggestions if you wanted to make a second post with additional concepts on this:

    https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/5628/economics/applying-economics-in-everyday-life/

    (I had a third concept as well and I wrote it down, but I didn’t take the paper I wrote it on in with me.)

    1.Distinction between the short run and the long run. Some things that work in the short term don’t work over the long term, though I can’t think of anything that fits that description right now, but also in terms of daily life, in the long run people have the time to adapt or adjust to changes that are much harder to adjust to in the short term.

    2.Asymmetrical information and the related concept of signalling. George Akerlof addressed this with a similar ‘question from everyday life’ in his The Market for Lemons (used cars) but, Asymmetrical information also explains, for instance, why franchise restaurants are found at stops for tourists/travelers along freeways.

    Prior to the rise of Donald Trump, Asymmetrical information was the biggest problem I noted during political campaigns: people know (or think they know) all about the present system, but when an opposition party presents an alternative approach, people can only guess how that would work. This presents an asymmetrical situation between the public knowledge of the governing party and the opposition party and leaves the opposition to be able to say ‘the grass is greener with us’ while, on the other hand, the government replies ‘you’re better with the devil you know.’

    Of course, economists can generally give some answer as to how the opposition party’s alternative approach would work, but, especially these days, many people dismiss economists as ‘elite intellectuals.’

    Also, I don’t know what it’s like in the U.K, but especially in the United States with the rise of what I refer to as ‘television economists’ who usually spout nonsense about their economic forecasting (I’m especially thinking of Larry Kudlow), many people unfortunately dismiss economists as people who go on about future job creation numbers that never actually occur.

    If I did have a question, it would be: why don’t academic economists publicly condemn these economic charlatans? Of course, I don’t know if those ‘television economists’ exist in Great Britain. However, since many of these charlatans work for private companies or for industry associations, I suspect they do.

  4. A couple other suggestions for a second post on economics in daily life with two of my favorite economics terms:

    1.Moral hazard. This was a term used frequently a few years ago especially in the United States when some loudmouthed television economist (I think for the Fox ‘News’ business channel) complained about some moral hazard he claimed then newly elected President Obama was pushing for in a piece of legislation around the time of the financial meltdown of 2008 that would have protected average consumers but for some reason this person didn’t complain about moral hazard when the banks (and bankers) were being bailed out.

    2.Dead Weight Loss/Monopoly Cartels/Creative Destruction
    Especially relevant now I think with the so-called ride sharing apps and maybe some other aspects of the ‘sharing economy.’

    This is an article on economics in everyday life:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/12/business/students-ponder-the-economics-of-everyday-life.html

    From that article:
    “The assignment is my response to the distressing finding that six months after having completed a standard introductory economics course, students are no better able to answer questions about basic economic principles than others who have never even taken economics. In standard courses, hundreds of concepts — many of them embedded in complex equations and graphs — often seem to go by in a blur. In contrast, grappling with questions that students care about appears to be a far more effective learning strategy. And that’s in no small part because the problems they pinpoint are so intriguing.”

    My view on the reason for that is similar to his, but a bit different. I think the problem is that economics (and all courses with a heavy mathematics component) are taught with the ‘number crunching’ aspects emphasized far too much, while the concepts and principles themselves are often regarded as what I call a ‘social science sideshow.’ (Actually I just came up with that term.)

    Of course, on the other hand, every economics teacher is an individual and not all of them fall into that trap.

    I also realize that some concepts in economics can only be understood with mathematics.

  5. What is a key monetary policy tool available to the monetary policy committee to reduce the inflation rate and the supply of money?

Comments are closed.

Item added to cart.
0 items - £0.00