In this post (benefits for the fat?), I looked at the economics of a guy who lost 30 stone, including a £10,000 operation paid for by the NHS. Should we pay for people to have an operation like this? Is there a case for giving fiscal rewards for people who lose weight?
The advantage of subsidies is that:
- Provides incentive for people to lose weight and be healthier
- Reducing obesity leads to lower health care costs and time lost due to poor health.
it may create an incentive to put on weight so you can gain benefits from losing weight.
May seem unfair for giving people extra money who eat too much. A better solution may be to place a tax on fatty foods. See: Tax on fatty foods
You may ask whether this idea could be extended:
Does this mean we should give rewards for people to stop smoking?
The government does very well out of smokers. It receives £7 billion a year in tax revenue and smokers save the government pension spending because they die early. From a fiscal perspective there is no incentive for the government to encourage people to quite
Should we give people benefits who stop stealing?
The problem here is one of moral hazard. If you give people benefits to stop stealing, you provide an extra fiscal incentive to start stealing in the first place. This idea would not be beneficial, in addition to being morally reprehensible.