Lump of labour fallacy – immigration

The lump of labour fallacy is the contention that the amount of work available in an economy is fixed.  But, most economists argue this belief there is a fixed number of jobs (or fixed number of hours) is usually incorrect. In summary Fallacy – “Immigrants take jobs of native workers.” Why this is a fallacy …

Read more

Why does capitalism cause monopoly?

Readers question: Firstly, I wholeheartedly praise the magnificent work done by you in exhibiting economic knowledge and demystifying it to us, the mediocre audience. I seriously question one fact that you presented about capitalism and how it “inevitably causes monopoly”. I grew really surprised and perplexed the moment I read that in “The problems of …

Read more

Economic abuse

Readers question: Is there anything in economic theory that addresses what I would like to call “economic abuse” Where the profit of a what a worker does is ten to a hundred times what the worker earns to the Owner or Individual paying the worker. The worker earns $10 a day doing labour that the …

Read more

Nobody wants a free good?

Readers Question: Is the following concept correct or not – Nobody wants a free good? Firstly, a free good is a good with zero opportunity cost. Water is usually a free good in the UK. Examples of a free good include: Water (where supply is abundant) Air (where supply is abundant) Blackberries growing in the …

Read more

The economics of Hollywood

Readers question: Why does Hollywood make so many superheroes movies nowadays? What can be the economics behind it?

I’m not really a movie goer. I think the last Superhero move I watched was the original Superman back in the days when Coal miners were still a political force and people used to rent videos to watch in VHS tape players.

One reason I don’t like the usual Hollywood movies is that they are so predictable, and frankly you can get soon bored of the same formula – good guy goes down on his luck, but when things look really bleak – Superman comes back from the brink, defeats the bad guy and everyone lives happily ever after.

So, if they are so depressingly predictable, why do so many super-hero style movies get made by Hollywood?

queens-lane-superman

Risk vs solid reward

Making movies is a risky business. But, ultimately studios are interested in making a profit – not in producing artistic films which may appeal to hard bitten film critics. You have to put a lot of money in, and you need to guarantee that you get a good return. With superhero style movies, they have a strong track record of getting decent revenues. If Superman 1,2,3, and 4 all made a profit. Then you could make an approximation that Superman 5 has a good chance of making profit too.

Suppose some new film director came along with a risky plot – something very independent, different, ‘artistic’ and challenging. – It could be a great success, but equally it could be a flop. You could make slightly higher than usual profits, but equally you could make a loss. Given the choice between a risky new style film and a guaranteed ‘banker’ – there is a strong economic incentive for you to choose the ‘safe’ option of another superman hero movie.

A good example, is the TV series ‘Breaking bad’ – It is critically acclaimed as one of the most innovative and well produced TV series of all times. But, when the creator approached TV networks, no one wanted to touch it. TV producers couldn’t see any track record for successful  / profitable TV based on a chemistry teacher cooking crystal meth. It was very successful in the end, but the success was unexpected. Generally, TV producers would rather commission something with a more certain audience (like minor celebrities eating worms in the jungle)

Advertising and brand loyalty

One difficulty with producing films is that you have to gain strong brand loyalty in a short space of time.  If nobody has heard about the subject of the film, it will be harder to attract interest. The advantage of producing a superhero movie is that there is an instant brand loyalty and awareness of the superhero like Spiderman / Superman. By using well known comic characters, you have effectively got a lot of free advertising – from the long period of customer awareness of the superhero.

The most successful film franchise – James Bond has a huge advantage because the brand of the film series is so well known. You know a James Bond film may be quite predictable, but at least you know you are going to see some good action shots, fast cars, beautiful women and spectacular backdrops.

It is one reason why books are often made into films. Awareness of the books, helps with the advertising for the film.

Read more

Flood defences as a public good

cyclists-flood

Here in Oxford, there is water everywhere. Yesterday, the main road into town (Abingdon Road) was closed due to flooding, and the cost to business and householders will be quite significant. There is a danger of even worse flooding to come. In one sense, it is an act of God. No one can do anything …

Read more

What does it mean to cut interest rates by 50 base points?

Readers Question: What does it mean when Bank of England cuts interest rates by 50 base points? A basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. If the Bank of England cuts interest rates by 0.50% from 1.5% to 1.0%. This is a cut of 50 basis points. Usually, interest rates are cut in small …

Read more

Question on the Closure of Factories

Readers Question: I am studying AS level economics and I have a homework which i’m stuck on. I was wondering what are the pros and cons of the government intervening in market failures such as those resulting from the immobility of labour, negative externalities and greater income inequality, following the closure of factories.

It’s a difficult AS question. Some ideas might include:

Advantages of Government Intervention

The existence of Negative externalities leads to overconsumption. A negative externality causes a harmful effect to a third party. Therefore the social cost is greater than the private cost. However, people ignore the costs to others and so in a free market there is overconsumption. Negative externalities of a factory closing down include the costs to the rest of society in the nearby town. It is not only workers who are adversely affected but local shops.

Immobility of labour can lead to geographical unemployment. i.e. jobs are available but workers find it difficult to move to these areas. Government intervention can subsidise firms who move to areas of high unemployment or subsidise workers who move to areas of low unemployment. This can help overcome market failure in the labour market and reduce the problem of geographical unemployment resulting from a factory closing down.

Read more

Item added to cart.
0 items - £0.00