Dual economy

Readers question: What is a ‘dual economy’?

A dual economy refers to the existence of two distinct types of economic segments within an economy. This involves:

  1. A capitalist based manufacturing sector (geared towards global markets)
  2. Labour intensive agricultural sector (low productivity, geared towards subsistence farming or local markets)


The British economist W. Arthur Lewis wrote an influential paper on the ‘dual economy’ in 1954. He observed that in many developing economies (usually a former colonial country) that the economy was split into these different two segments.

The bulk of the economy was a labour intensive agricultural sector producing primary products. Lewis observed that in the agricultural sector, productivity was often very low, and farmers often lacked the traditional profit incentive and dynamism usually found in a free market economy.

Alongside this agricultural sector was a smaller manufacturing sector, which tended to have higher productivity. Firms in the manufacturing sector were often set up by foreign colonial powers.

It was not just that developing economies had different sectors, but that the different sectors had different economic motivations. Labourers in the agricultural sector usually lacked education, access to capital and had poor prospects for income growth. Agriculture was also focused on meeting the needs of local markets or subsistence farming and was insular in outlook. In the other manufacturing sector of the economy, there was a greater dynamism and an incentive to increase profits through expansion and investment. The manufacturing sector also faced greater global competition which spurs efficiency growth.

The dual nature of the economy may have been heightened by the fact manufacturing firms were set up / managed by owners from developed capitalist economies in the northern hemisphere.

Lewis argued that given the disparity in productivity, developing economies could make substantial economic growth by encouraging labour to move from the unproductive agricultural sector to the more profitable and productive manufacturing sector. Developing countries which concentrated on just agriculture were doomed to low savings, low productivity and low growth.

Another issue with a dual economy was that there is a potential problem from concentrating on agriculture exports. Agricultural goods tend to have a low-income elasticity of demand and are price inelastic. If a developing economy increases the output of agricultural products, this increase in supply is likely to depress prices and lead to lower export revenue. Because demand is price inelastic, they would make more revenue by restricting supply and keeping prices high. This is another reason to diversify out of agriculture and not just concentrate on agricultural output.

Limitations of the Dual economy Theory

Not all economists accepted Lewis theory that profit incentives exist in manufacturing, but not agriculture.

  • Colonial powers didn’t just invest in manufacturing; often it was in the exploitation of raw materials and agriculture, e.g. tea plantations, tobacco plantations.
  • Agricultural products often are exported to global markets.
  • Shifting labour from agriculture to manufacturing wasn’t always helpful unless labour was sufficiently skilled and the right kind of manufacturing was able to develop. Some developing economies have achieved a better return from increasing investment in agriculture rather than manufacturing.
  • Studies (e.g. World Bank) have suggested a positive link between growth in industry and growth in agriculture. Rather than being separate, there is greater interdependence. If agriculture stagnates, it can be hard to grow the industry. But, if the agriculture sector grows, this helps other sectors of the economy, such as manufacturing.

Do any dual economies exist in the modern day?

To some extent, developing economies do have these two types of economic segments. If you look at a developing economy like China, productivity and income growth in agriculture are much lower compared to manufacturing. China is an example of a developing economy which has benefited from absorbing surplus labour in agriculture into the more profitable manufacturing export sector.

Lewis perhaps exaggerated the separation between the different sectors. It is an oversimplification to say manufacturing has a profit incentive lacking in agriculture. The agricultural sector can also benefit from similar investment and productivity growth and play a role in helping developing economies.


10 thoughts on “Dual economy”

  1. The dual economy is very much true in many respects.I feel though that Lewis was bias in trying to use profit incentives
    and a determing factor between the agriculture and manufacturing sector.

  2. hello. could you site an example about the countries who had profited more in their agricultural sector rather than their industrialized sector.

  3. Harkens back to the ‘mercantilist philosophy,’ and also ‘benefits of diversity’ ‘economies of scale’ and ‘acquired and comparative advantages.’

Comments are closed.

Item added to cart.
0 items - £0.00