Bank of England criticisms

Recently, the Economist published an article (You can fool some of the people…), pointing out several economic commentators were increasingly critical of UK economic policy and the Bank of England’s monetary policy in particular. Is the Bank of England really losing grip of monetary policy? or are they doing the best job in difficult circumstances?

Criticism of the Bank of England Monetary Policy

1. Inflation above target

cpi-inflation

The Bank of England have been given an inflation target of CPI 2% +/-1. Yet in the past five years, inflation has rarely been below the target. Inflation has frequently been higher than forecasts, and the Bank seem willing to tolerate a higher rate of inflation. In a recent article, David Smith writes:

“It (the B of E)  has rarely hit the 2% inflation target in the past eight years and, on its own forecasts will not do so in the next 2-3 years. A decade of above-target inflation is, for any central bank, flaky. The Bank has lost its compass.” (the Bank of England has lost its compass)

The Economist also worries about the persistence of missing the inflation target.

“This time, however, the Bank thinks inflation will be above target throughout the two-year forecast period. That will equate to more than five years of missed targets or, as the Bank euphemistically puts it, a temporary, albeit protracted, period of above-target inflation. (Dear Joanna, be flexible)

2. Depreciation in Sterling

Despite the threat of above target inflation, the Bank has been quite sanguine about letting the Pound depreciate. The Bank of England have given the impression that a depreciation is necessary to restore the balance of the economy – improve the current account and increase exports. But, as noted, the depreciation in the Pound has given disappointing returns. For the depreciation, we risk more inflation and a decline in living standards.

3. Quantitative easing.

As a percentage of GDP, the UK has one of the largest programs of quantitative easing in the world. However, the Bank has no clear exit strategy, and some fear that we risk a bond bubble (rising bond yields), when we reverse the policy; it could leave the UK struggling to sell sufficient gilts to finance the large budget deficits.

In Defence of the Bank of England

1. Inflation in not the major problem

economic-growth-uk-ons-quarter

The UK has experienced a longer and deeper decline in GDP than the great depression. The UK looks to be heading to a triple dip recession. This shows that the economy is experiencing an unprecedented situation of depressed demand. Given fiscal tightening, weak global growth and very weak bank lending, the Bank of England should be pursuing monetary easing. To worry about inflation being slightly above target, during this prolonged recession would be to ignore the Bank’s dual mandate of inflation and economic growth. Even if they didn’t have a dual mandate, common sense suggests the monetary authorities should  try to stimulate demand when you are experiencing a stagnating economy.

2. The inflation target is symmetrical – 1-3% not less than 2%

Some commentators have criticised the Bank for not keeping inflation below a target of 2%, but this ignores the fact the Bank of England have a target of 2% +/-1. Even by the strict criteria of inflation targeting, the Bank are targeting an inflation rate of 1-3%. It is true the ECB have an inflation target of less than 2%, but the performance of the EU economy doesn’t justify the UK suddenly adopting a stricter approach to inflation.

Read more

Fuel Consumption in UK

In the post-war period, consumption of  vehicle fuel (petrol / diesel) increased dramatically as car ownership rose and more journeys were made by car. However, since 2007, there has been a significant drop in vehicle fuel consumption, with demand falling over 20%

Many factors affect demand for vehicle fuel, including price, income, fuel efficiency, quality of alternatives (public transport) and general preferences.

consumption-of-fuel

If we ignore all the income effects, social effects and changes in consumer preferences (which admittedly is very significant) we can make a very rough estimate at the price elasticity of demand for vehicle fuel.

Between Q3 2002 and Q3 2012 households consumption of vehicle fuel fell by 18% per head. During this period the annual per litre price of petrol increased 85% and diesel  88%.  Department of Energy and Climate Change

This gives a (very rough) PED for petrol of  (-18/85) = – 0.21

It is what we would expect – demand for vehicle fuel is price inelastic, but higher prices do reduce demand somewhat.

Factors affecting demand for fuel

Cost of Fuel

Due to rising costs of fuel, households are still spending more on fuel. In 2002, we spent £89 per head on fuel. In 2012, this had increased to £129. Given the rise in the fuel burden, it is not surprising people have sought to reduce consumption. (see: fuel poverty)

Income effects

The graph shows that air fuel is much more sensitive to income effects. During the start of the recession from 2007 to 2009, demand for airline fell almost 30% in a short space of time. This indicates that airline fuel is income elastic – sensitive to changes in income. Airline fuel has not really recovered from 2009. The recession will also be having an impact on demand for petrol. The biggest decline for vehicle fuel has occurred during this period. Faced with rising prices and squeezed real wages, people have been cutting back on vehicle fuel. When the economy recovers, we can expect a renewed increase in demand for vehicle fuel.

Read more

UK Exports to Non-EU countries

One of the (many) puzzling features of the UK economy is the very disappointing export performance. Despite a 25-30% depreciation of the Pound, the UK current account deficit has remained stubbornly high and even increased at the end of 2012. Essentially, the sustained depreciation in the value of Sterling has not caused an export led …

Read more

Debt Spiral Explained

A debt spiral refers to a situation where a country (or firm or individual) sees ever-increasing levels of debt. This increasing levels of debt and debt interest become unsustainable, eventually leading to debt default.

Types of Debt Spirals

  • Public sector debt. This is debt that the government owe to the private sector (e.g. UK public sector debt). Some government debt may also be sold to overseas investors.
  • External debt. This is debt that a country owes to other countries. It includes both government external debt and private external debt.

A debt spiral could occur with just government debt. However, if a country also has high levels of external debt, it makes a debt spiral more likely because foreign investors are more likely to withdraw funds at signs of difficulty; this is termed ‘capital flight’.

Stages in debt spiral

  1. Debt Levels increase. (This could be due to overspending, inefficient tax collection, bank bailouts or economic slowdown)
  2. Markets become concerned about debt levels leading to higher bond yields (higher rate of interest)
  3. Higher cost of servicing debt. Rising debt increases debt interest payments. But, also Governments have to pay higher interest payments on debt because of rising bond yields. This increases government spending even more.
  4. To reduce bond yields, governments need to cut spending and increase tax.
  5. Trying to reduce debt can cause a recession. The Impact of spending cuts leads to lower aggregate demand more unemployment and lower economic growth. Lower economic growth leads to lower tax revenues.
  6. The shrinking economy means it is harder to meet debt repayments. Confidence falls. Bond yields remain high despite the spending cuts.
  7. With a shrinking tax payments, the government struggles to meet interest payments. Also markets no longer want to buy more government debt, leading to partial or total default.

Read more

The problem with politics and economics

When I do mock interviews for PPE at Oxford, one of my favourite questions to ask is. –

Who should manage the economy – unelected professional economists or politicians who get elected but might not know about economics?

There’s no easy answer. In practise it is an element of both. But, essentially, in a democracy, we would rather have elected politicians making the key economic decisions, especially on issues such as tax and spending. At least, we can vote them out if we don’t agree with their general approach. There is also no guarantee that professional economists will do a particularly good job. The technocrats in the ECB are hardly covering themselves in glory in their management of the Eurozone economy in recent years. However, in recent decades, we have seen moves to make monetary policy managed by an independent Central Bankers. The government nominally retain control over the inflation target, but it has placed significant economic influence in the hands of ‘professional economists’ rather than politicians. The argument is that independent Central Bankers are less likely to be swayed by political pressure to cut interest rates before an election.

The hope is that elected politicians will take advice from impartial economists and make the decisions based on evidence rather than looking for something to justify their political ideology or finding a justification for what they did in the past.

However, there are quite a few times, when the political process causes great frustration. One of the most obvious problems is the difficulty that politicians have in admitting they are wrong and changing their point of view. There is great political capital in sticking to your guns. Mrs Thatcher was lauded for her ‘this lady’s not for turning speech’ But, despite the success of the rhetoric, it’s easy to forget she was sticking to highly deflationary fiscal and monetary policies, which caused UK unemployment to increase to 3 million and stay there for several years.  At the time, over  300 economists wrote to the Times to argue for an easing of policy. An easing of policy would have mitigated the worst of the recession, whilst still bringing inflation under control. But, it was better politics to stick to extreme policies and concentrate on blaming the problems on other parties.

Read more

Negative Interest Rates

Readers Question: Is it possible to have negative interest rates?

Negative interest rates occur when a bank charges you money for the privilege of looking after your savings. It is  possible to have a negative interest rate (e.g. -0.5%) Although it is quite rare. The Bank of England have recently talked about the possibility of a negative interest rate for commercial bank deposits at the Bank of England.

Why is Bank of England Talking about a negative interest rate?

The UK economy is still stagnant with little sign of economic growth. Usually, a prolonged recession would lead to lower interest rates to encourage borrowing. However, since interest rates fell to 0.5% in March 2009, interest rates have stayed the same as there is little precedent for cutting interest rates further.

The Bank has tried quantitative easing but this has not really encouraged bank lending and normal economic activity.

The Bank of England, in particular want to encourage lending to small businesses – small businesses have complained it is very difficult to borrow from commercial banks in the present economic climate.  At the moment, commercial banks prefer to increase their cash reserves, which they deposit at Bank of England and not lend. At the moment commercial banks get a small interest rate payment 0.5% on their deposits. However, if there is a cost for depositing money at the Bank of England, they would have a greater incentive to lend money. In theory, commercial banks will lend more and this would stimulate business investment and economic growth. Higher lending would also help to reduce unemployment and reduce the cyclical budget deficit.

see more on: basic economics of cutting interest rates

How would it work?

The Bank of England would probably introduce a new deposit rate. For example, deposits over £1billion at the Bank of England would be charged the negative interest rate.

The first £1 billion may still receive the base rate of +0.5%. This means that small building societies would not face a negative interest rate. This could cause problems because a negative interest rate could mean they would have to pay people with tracker mortgages (mortgages that follow base rate), and they could go out of business because they couldn’t recoup money from savers. The deposit rate would mainly affect the large commercial banks with high cash reserves.

What would happen to saving rates?

If the Bank of England had a negative interest rates on deposits, commercial banks would be less keen to encourage banks deposits, therefore they may reduce interest rates on saving accounts.  Savers would see a fall in income.

In theory, lower interest rates may encourage spending (rather than saving (substitution effect). However, consumers may be quite inelastic to the interest rate. It may also be outweighed by the decline in income of savers who rely on interest payments (income effect).

What are the Problems of a Negative Interest Rate?

  • Some fear a negative interest rate could encourage a new lending boom. Banks might be so keen to get rid of cash, they start lending to business without evaluating how good the loan is. Austrian economists are particularly critical of negative interest rates as they argue it can lead to asset booms and distort the market. However, there is no sign of a new lending boom in the short term, the real problem is that banks don’t want to lend because of the economic situation.
  • Savers will lose out. With inflation already above target, a fall in the saving rate will lead to an even bigger negative real interest rate. Savers will see a fall in their real wealth and living standards.
  • Banks may still not want to lend. The main thing holding back lending may be the overall state of the economy. Even cutting interest rates to negative may fail to increase lending.

Read more

Osborne, UK Debt and Credit Ratings

I was going to write a lengthy post on George Osborne, UK debt  and Britain’s credit rating downgrade, but fortunately Simon Wren Lewis said pretty much everything I wanted to say: What George Osborne did with his austerity programme was the equivalent of putting a sick patient on a starvation diet accompanied by cold showers. …

Read more

Is a strong currency a good thing?

Readers Comment from post: Should the UK join the Eurozone So now it is 2013. Britain has spent a number of years with its interest rate set at just about zero, has entered a triple recession, has lost it’s AAA credit rating and Sterling is only worth €1.15 a drop of over 30% against the …

Read more

Item added to cart.
0 items - £0.00