Readers Question: I am wondering why the 75 billion of quantitative easing that the Bank of England announced today to be “injected into the economy” isn’t spent on infrastructural projects? Why spend those funds on government bonds? This doesn’t seem to be the best way of using these funds. Many thanks.
It’s a good question. I wrote on the latest round of quantitative easing here: Keep Calm and Print Money
I think the Bank of England would respond by saying it is out of their remit to start deciding which infrastructure projects to start giving money to. Their constitution probably doesn’t allow giving money directly to firms who promise to invest. It would make the Bank of England more political. Their remit is just monetary policy not fiscal policy as well.
By buying government bonds (they could also buy corporate and mortgage bonds) the Bank of England takes a more neutral approach. They say it is their job to:
- Reduce interest rates on bonds
- Increase money supply
They hope this will prevent double dip and prevent inflation falling below target in medium term.
But, then it is up to free market to respond and decide how to use extra money.