Readers Question: List and briefly describe the positive and negative attributes of multinational corporations (MNCs).
Multinational corporations are large companies with operations in several countries across the world. For example, Apple, Ford, Coca-Cola, Alphabet (Google) and Microsoft. Their size and turnover can be greater than the total GDP of many developing economies.
Benefits of Multinational Corporations
- Create wealth and jobs around the world. Inward investment by multinationals creates much needed foreign currency for developing economies. They also create jobs and help raise expectations of what is possible.

- Their size and scale of operation enable them to benefit from economies of scale enabling lower average costs and prices for consumers. This is particularly important in industries with very high fixed costs, such as car manufacture and airlines.
- Large profits can be used for research & development. For example, oil exploration is costly and risky; this could only be undertaken by a large firm with significant profit and resources. It is similar for drug manufacturers who need to take risks in developing new drugs.
- Ensure minimum standards. The success of multinationals is often because consumers like to buy goods and services where they can rely on minimum standards. i.e. if you visit any country you know that the Starbucks coffee shop will give something you are fairly familiar with. It may not be the best coffee in the district, but it won’t be the worst. People like the security of knowing what to expect.
- Products which attain global dominance have a universal appeal. McDonald’s, Coca-Cola, Apple have attained their market share due to meeting consumer preferences.
- Foreign investments. Multinationals engage in Foreign direct investment. This helps create capital flows to poorer/developing economies. It also creates jobs. Although wages may be low by the standards of the developed world – they are better jobs than alternatives and gradually help to raise wages in the developing world.
- Outsourcing of production by multinationals – enables lower prices; this increases disposable incomes of households in the developed world and enables them to buy more goods and services – creating new sources of employment to offset the lost jobs from outsourcing manufacturing jobs.
Criticisms of Multinational Corporations
- Companies are often interested in profit at the expense of the consumer. Multinational companies often have monopoly power which enables them to make an excess profit. For example, Shell made profits of £14bn last year.
- Tax avoidance. Many multinationals set up companies in countries with the lowest tax rate. They funnel profit through the countries with the lowest corporation tax rates – e.g. Bermuda, Ireland, Luxemburg. For example: in 2011, Google had £2.5bn of UK sales, but only paid £3.4 million UK tax. A tax rate of 00.1% despite having a global-wide profit margin of 33%. (tax avoiding companies) This means the multinationals are ‘free-riding on smaller companies who cannot attain the same creative tax accounts.
- Cash reserves – Apple has cash reserves of $216bn, 93% of which is overseas. This represents deadweight welfare loss. It is not being used for investment
- Their market dominance makes it difficult for local small firms to thrive. For example, it is argued that big supermarkets are squeezing the margins of local corner shops leading to less diversity.
- In developing economies, big multinationals can use their economies of scale to push local firms out of business.
- In the pursuit of profit, multinational companies often contribute to pollution and use of non-renewable resources which is putting the environment under threat. For example, some MNCs have been criticised of outsourcing pollution and environmental degradation to developing economies where pollution standards are lower.
- ‘Sweat-shop labour’ MNCs have been criticised for using ‘slave labour’ – workers who are paid a pittance by Western standards.
- Outsourcing to cheaper labour-cost economies has caused loss of jobs in the developed world. This is an issue in the US where many multinationals have outsourced production around the world.
Evaluation
- Some criticisms of MNCs may be due to other issues. For example, the fact MNCs pollute is perhaps a failure of government regulation. Also, small firms can pollute just as much.
- MNCs may pay low wages by western standards but, this is arguably better than the alternatives of not having a job at all. Also, some multinationals have responded to concerns over standards of working conditions and have sought to improve them.
Examples of Multinational Companies doing good
- Patagonia (US retailer of outdoor clothing) Patagoniadonates 1% of sales to environmental causes and has helped protect millions of acres of wilderness. It actively campaigns for climate action and fair labour standards in its supply chain.
- Ikea (furniture) IKEA uses 100% renewable electricity in its stores and factories and aims for all products to be made from renewable or recycled materials by 2030. It also funds refugee job programmes and affordable housing projects.
- Vodafone (mobile phone network) Vodafone’s “M-Pesa” mobile banking service revolutionised financial inclusion in Africa, enabling millions without bank accounts to send and receive money securely.
- The Body Shop (Cosmetics) Pioneered cruelty-free cosmetics (not tested on animals) and community trade sourcing since the 1980s. Supports small producers in developing countries.
- Unilever (Consumer goods – food/washing power) Unilever’s “Sustainable Living Plan” aims to seek growth without adverse environmental impact. It promotes fair trade sourcing (e.g. Rainforest Alliance tea, sustainable palm oil) and has helped millions access hygiene and sanitation products through Lifebuoy and Domestos campaigns.
Examples of Multinational Companies doing bad
- Shell (oil company) Shell has been accused of severe environmental damage in the Niger Delta, Nigeria — including oil spills, gas flaring, and harm to local livelihoods. It has faced legal actions for human rights abuses linked to local repression of protests in the 1990s.
- Nestlé (coffee, powdered milk) Criticised for promoting baby formula in developing countries (leading to health issues when clean water was unavailable), child labour in cocoa supply chains, and water extraction controversies (e.g. bottling water from drought-stricken areas).
- Facebook (Meta) Accused of selling user data to advertisers (including political campaigns) (Cambridge Analytica scandal), allowing misinformation to spread, and harming mental health among young users. It has also been criticised for inadequate content moderation in developing countries, fuelling ethnic tensions.
- BP (British Petroleum) (oil) Responsible for the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico — one of the worst environmental disasters in history.
- Volkswagen (car) In 2015, VW was caught in the “Dieselgate” scandal — installing software to cheat emissions tests, leading to millions of cars emitting far more pollution than claimed.
- X (Twitter) Social media network. Accused of promoting far right divisive content. Failing to moderate extreme content.


Tejvan Pettinger studied PPE at LMH, Oxford University.
MNCs are good though they have a aim of taking the benefit of undeveloped countries to better themselves ,,from my point of view,,since even if employment is created we are enticed not to work appropriately to develop our own indigenous local company
This post is very simple to read and appreciate without leaving any details out. Great work!
The parent companies have been siphoning wealth from the host companies in the firm of return on capital investment, interest on financial loan , profit on trading of goods and services, etc. through multinational companies. It is a kind of explanation of the host countries
either MNCs are in our country or not we can progress because they are the one who exploited our resources and exploited us with their expensive finish good.
i think multinational corporation is help who need and who looking for a job but not to environment
mncs is just bad