
Readers Comment: From National Debt: What appears tragic from this is that Britain’s cultural history can be read off from the 1900 – 2000 PSBR debt burden chart from the Bank of England above.
The chart’s peaks of PSBR above 100% of GDP mirror exactly the historical periods of social misery which George Orwell documented during the 1920s, 1930s and 1940s, with Britain characterised as a land of rootless tramps and unemployed all reliant on piecemeal charity, low paid jobs and money-lenders, a nation which even Orwell himself could not envisage having a universal welfare state. Our collective memories of this poverty finally begin to lift around 1965 and Beatlemania, a time exactly co-inciding with PSBR finally falling below 100% of GDP.
- Note: PSBR is the annual public sector borrowing requirement. This graph shows total public sector debt (often referred to as national debt).
It depends which way you look at it.
- Cause or Effect. For example, the rise in borrowing in the 1930s was due to the Great Depression. In fact efforts to keep government borrowing down in 1931 (cutting benefits and raising taxes) only made the Recession much worse. It is fairer to say borrowing is an effect of economic malaise rather than a cause. At the same time, the long period of economic expansion made it easy to reduce government borrowing through the 1960s
You could also say: Look how much debt the UK had in 1945, yet, rather than focus on spending cuts, the government set up a very ambitious welfare state and universal health care.
Despite public sector debt reaching over 200% in 1950, this did not cripple the economy in the coming decades. The relatively huge level of debt proved no barrier to one of the longest periods of economic expansion on records.
People might say it was different in 1950
- It was easy to cut military spending which arose from the Second World War. (today Military spending is a very small % of overall government spending perhaps 3 or 4%)
- Private sector saving was higher in the 40s and 50s making it easier for the government to borrow.
- Demographic factors were more favourable in the 40s and 50s. There was a young growing workforce (boosted by immigration). Now we face an ageing population with increasing demands on health care and pensions.
Yet, whilst the above is true to a certain extent, if the banking sector recovers, the government should be able to recover a significant part of the financial sector intervention.
- Excluding financial sector intervention public sector debt is (46.6% per cent of GDP)
- With Financial sector intervention public sector debt is over £800bn or 56.8%.
So, even though public sector debt is definitely going to rise very rapidly, over the next few years. It is not necessarily the end of the world as some would like to make us fear.






2 comments ↓
Market fundamentals seems to have hit the top with valuations no more an intrinsic aspect, rather, speculation and higher returns on assets seems to be the pursuit for these investors. Ever since the March 9th rally, the global markets have seen unprecedented rally with some markets doubling in just 6 months or so. I remember one trigger, a report published in mid-February (16th precisely) early this year from Mumbai, India, by an economist who rightly predicted this scintillating Bull Run when the market was crashing down like cards. Moreover, the same analyst has been able to develop a statistical market model and an indicator system which might prove (and its proving either) doomsday for technical analyst or chartists around the globe. It runs something like p-value based trading system, which has some unique utilities. Using this, one can model interest rate trends, crude prices and other variables. However and whatever may it be, even if Roubini did correctly predict the recession, he was too pessimistic about the early recovery (see Bernanke’s comments on economic recover). And its’ time again we are into a major commodity bubble this time, with so much liquidity sloshing around, inflation is bound to happen, only by a matter of time, and by then, Fed would have had to act on its FFR, kept stagnant at 0.25% now. A very crucial incident that strangely and unexpectedly altered Asian Economy is that, Japan appeared to have recovered from her prolonged stagflation, marking the awakening of a sleepy-giant consumption driven economy. This single factor proves that the World economy no later, will however recover faster than that expected by Roubini and Co.
aks. jone
“(today Military spending is a very small % of overall government spending perhaps 3 or 4%)”
It’s actually closer to 5%.
Whilst 2% sounds like nothing, 5% is about £33bn, 3% is about £20bn.
Otherwise good article, thanks
Leave a Comment