Measuring Living Standards

Measuring living standards is important for economic policy. However, in practice, there are several difficulties in measuring living standards and therefore there are several different measures we could use.

The most common measure of living standards is to start with real GDP per Capita.

World Map of GDP per Capita

GDP per capita
GDP per Capita. Source: Source: IMF

 

GDP per capita – GDP measures National Output / National Income. Per capita is the average income per person in the economy. This is a rough guide to living standards because it measures average incomes / the amount produced in an economy. However, income and average output is only a rough guide to living standards. (for example, increased GDP per Capita could be at the cost of increased pollution; in this case, higher GDP could lead to a decline in living standards.

GDP – Purchasing Power Parity PPP

Countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_Per_Capita_in_2015 Source: IMF

Another important factor in measuring living standards is GDP measured at Purchasing power parity. This means that the statistics take into account the actual cost of living. For example, some countries may have lower GDP, but the cost of living is much cheaper. PPP adjusts for these different costs of living.

Real GDP per Capita / Hours Worked

A more accurate guide to living standards is to take into account the number of hours worked. If you gain high GPD per capita but have to work a 12 hour day, then this is less desirable than same income for 6 hours work per today. (measuring living standards / hours worked.)

Household expenditure/consumption

Most measures of living standards focus on income. However, income is only a rough guide to the goods and services you can actually buy. Some people may have very high living costs (e.g. rent / council tax / transport costs). Therefore, the quantity of goods and services you can actually buy will give a better guide to living standards than just income. Another issue is that some people may receive benefits in kind. E.g. those on means tested benefits often receive prescriptions and dentist visits for free. Therefore, their living standards are better than their actual income may suggest.

When comparing UK vs US, one feature of the US is that people have to devote a high % of income to health care insurance.

Poverty and Living Standards

An important factor in measuring living standards for the economy is the number of people living below the poverty line.

The poverty line is defined as:

The level of expenditure necessary to buy a minimum level of nutrition and other basic necessities. The World Bank says that the poverty line can vary somewhat from country to country, reflecting different costs of living for taking part in the everyday life of society.

Read more

Cinema Attendance in UK

cinema-admissions

Cinema admissions in UK 1935-2011 In the 1930s, the cinema was one of the main forms of entertainment in the UK. During the war years, and post-war austerity of the 1940s, cinema-going reached a peak at over 1.64 billion admissions in 1946. After this postwar peak, there was a gradual decline in the 1950s, before …

Read more

Altruism and Behavioural Economics

Behavioural economics is a branch of economics that seeks to understand the motivations and reasons behind individual decisions. Rational choice In traditional economics, there is a very basic assumption that individuals are rational utility maximisers. i.e. firms seek to maximise profits; workers seek to maximise income and levels of consumption. (see – rational economic man) …

Read more

Inefficiencies within Greek economy

Over Christmas and the New Year I visited Greece – landing at Athens airport then hiring a car to Kalamata. After writing many articles on the economic troubles of Greece, it was interesting to visit in person. Whilst enjoying a holiday, I was always aware – in the back of my mind – the Greek …

Read more

Monopsony Exploitation

monopsony
  • Monopsony occurs when there is one buyer and many sellers.
  • In the labour market, a monopsony occurs with one employer and many workers wanting to gain employment.
  • Arguably, monopsony power enables firms to ‘exploit’ workers by setting lower wages and employing fewer workers than in a competitive market.

To visualise monopsony power, we could think of a coal mining town in the nineteenth century. In these towns, the principal source of employment was a coal mine owner (or cotton mill owner). If workers couldn’t get employment in the coal mine, or cotton mill there were few other alternatives. Hence we can understand why workers in the Victorian era were often facing low wages and dreadful conditions.

In this case of monopsony power, the coal mine owner has the ability to be a wage setter. A monopsony can pay wages lower than in a competitive market.

Diagram of Monopsony Exploitation

 

monopsony

The marginal cost of employing extra workers increases at a faster rate than the average cost. Because if you increase the wage rate to attract more workers, you have to pay everyone a higher wage.

A monopsony maximises profits by employing a quantity of workers where MR = MC (Q2). This means they only have to pay a wage of W2. This is lower than wage in a competitive market (W1), there are also fewer workers employed.

Read more

Keynesianism vs Monetarism

Readers Questions Could you please explain the comparison between the Keynesianism & monetarism? Keynesianism emphasises the role that fiscal policy can play in stabilising the economy. In particular Keynesian theory suggests that higher government spending in a recession can help enable a quicker economic recovery. Keynesians say it is a mistake to wait for markets …

Read more

Elastic demand

Demand is price elastic if a change in price causes a bigger percentage change in demand. It will have a PED of greater than one. Example of elastic demand % change in Q.D – 60/110 = – 0.545 % change in price 15/65 = 0.23 In the above example, the PED = -2.36 Characteristics of …

Read more

Liquidity explained

liquidity-trap-ms-demand-for-money

Liquidity refers to the ease at which assets can be converted into cash.

  • An asset is said to be liquid if it is easy to buy and sell; for example, short-date government gilts are a highly liquid market because it is easy to sell on the bond markets.
  • As asset is said to be illiquid if it is difficult to buy and sell. For example, a house is a very illiquid asset because to sell a house requires considerable time and expense. By the time you have found a buyer, the price of a house may have changed considerably – especially during boom and busts.

The importance of liquidity

An investor may need both liquid and illiquid assets. You need liquid assets to deal with any unexpected short-term crisis. But, illiquid assets may offer a greater chance for capital gains and higher yield.

For example, if you put money in a current account, you have instantaneous access, but interest rates tend to be low. If you put money in a time deposit account, you have to give the bank a seven day or 30-day advance warning you need the money. This makes your savings more illiquid, but the bank compensates by paying a higher interest rate.

Liquidity ratio

A liquidity ratio refers to the number of liquid assets to overall assets. If a firm is highly liquid – it has a high proportion of assets that can easily be converted to cash to pay off any obligations.

A low liquidity ratio means a firm has a shortage of liquid assets and may struggle to meet short-term debt obligations.

Cash reserve ratio

A bank may be required to keep a certain percentage of its assets in the form of liquid assets. It is the fraction of customer deposits held in cash reserves.

Cash reserves are not profitable. If a bank lends deposits to other customers, it can charge interest and make more profit. But bank loans are highly illiquid because the bank cannot immediately ask for the loan back.

Bank Liquidity measured by Bank of England
Bank Liquidity fell to a record low in 2005.

A problem of the credit crisis is that banks had a very low cash-reserve ratio. This led to a liquidity crisis when banks couldn’t raise sufficient funds on short-term money markets.

Read more

Item added to cart.
0 items - £0.00