Relationship between stock market and economy

Readers Question: What’s the relationship between a countries economy and it’s stock market? Is it always true that the stock market reflects a country’s economic conditions?

Generally speaking, the stock market will reflect the economic conditions of an economy. If an economy is growing then output will be increasing and most firms should be experiencing increased profitability. This higher profit makes the company shares more attractive – because they can give bigger dividends to shareholders. A long period of economic growth will tend to benefit shares.

By contrast, if the stock market predicts a recession, then share prices will generally fall – in anticipation of lower profits.

Dow Jones industrial average

Dow Jones
Dow Jones fell 2008/09 due to a recession. Source: St Louis Fed

If the economy is forecast to enter into a recession, then stock markets will generally fall. This is because a recession means lower profits, fewer dividends and even the prospect of firms going bankrupt, which would be bad news for shareholders.

Also, in a period of uncertainty, investors may prefer to buy bonds for the greater security and avoid shares, because of the greater risk involved.

Do falling share prices indicate a recession?

However, share prices can fall for many reasons other than recession. An oft-repeated quote is that ‘stock markets have predicted ten of the past five recessions.’ What this means is that sometimes a fall in share prices is related to a recession. But, sometimes share prices fall and there is no correlation with the economy. It could be a correction of over-valued prices or a change in market sentiment.

1987 Stock market crash

FTSE_100_index
Source: Thrapper, Wikipedia. CC-SA-BY 3.0

In October 1987, stock markets around the world fell 25%. Many feared this predicted a major global recession. In response policymakers cut interest rates. But, the stock market crash appeared to have no bearing on the economy. The late 1980s were a boom time in many western economies. Even now, investors are not entirely sure why share prices fell 25%. Some blame ‘technical factors.’

2018 decline

Towards the back end of 2018, stock markets have been falling. Many fear this signals the possibility of a recession but it is too early to say definitely whether there is a recession around the corner.

Why can stock markets rise in a recession?

In a recession or period of uncertainty, stock markets can sometimes increase, why is this?

Anticipation effects. Stock markets are forward-looking. The stock market may already have priced in the effect of the recession and now the stock market is anticipating a recovery. For example, stock markets in 2007 and 2008 performed badly in anticipation of a US recession. But, during a long period of economic stagnation, stock markets might do better than expected because they are recovering former losses.

Profits as a share of GDP. Since the 2008 credit crunch, we have seen company profit become a bigger share of national income. Despite low economic growth, firms have been able to increase profitability. In short, real wage growth has been muted, but many companies have seen a rise in profits and cash reserves. This is due to factors, such as the monopoly power of large IT firms, such as Apple, Google and Microsoft. Therefore, despite relatively weak economic growth, publically listed companies, are still attractive to shareholders because they have retained their profitability, and even increased it faster than GDP growth.

Ultra-low interest rates. In 2016, there was a rise in government bonds with negative yields. This means investors were buying bonds – even though, they lose money because of negative interest rates. This is because, in that  climate, investors were pessimistic about the fortunes of the economy. With great uncertainty in the economy, investors are happy to buy bonds for the security they offer – even though they have very poor returns. Because of ultra-low interest rates, shares became relatively more attractive. Investors are willing to buy shares, despite the threat of recession, because they at least have a good yield compared to bonds.

Ironically, the stock market can do relatively well because there is a poor choice of investment opportunities.

Selective share prices

It is also worth noting that within the stock market, different firms and sectors will be more affected by bad economic news. For example, after Brexit June 2016, we see a fall in share price for sectors, such as construction and banks. These sectors are more affected by an economic downturn. In a downturn, with falling house prices, we will see a big fall in demand for building new houses and also demand for luxury items. Banks may lose out because of the decline in profitability and demand for loans.

However, other sectors may prove more robust. For example, food and drink are less likely to be affected by a recession. Even in times of negative growth, people will still want to buy food and drink.

FTSE-100 vs FTSE-250

FTSE-100

FTSE-100
FTSE-100 since 1985. FTSE-100 fell 2000 to 2004 – despite good economic growth and low inflation.

After the Brexit vote, the FTSE-100 has done much better than the FTSE-250. This is because the FTSE-100 is mainly comprised of multinational firms, whose profitability is dependent on strength of US and global economy; they are less reliant on UK economy and the value of the Pound. However, the FTSE-250 is composed of smaller companies who are more dependent on UK economy, and so are more influenced by prospects of a UK recession.

Read more

The Tortoise Economy

A tortoise economy refers to an economy that is barely growing – either economic growth is stagnant or growth is very slow. In particular, it has been used to describe a sluggish recovery from recession. In the aftermath of the great recession – 2007/08, many western economies experienced a very slow economic recovery. GDP was …

Read more

The strength of the German economy post-war

Readers Question – what explains the strength of the German economy post-war? In the aftermath of the Second World War, the German economy was devastated by years of war, price controls, rationing and the loss of patents and top scientists to the US. However, by 1950, the economy was transformed by investment, economic growth and …

Read more

The housing boom 2000-07

Readers Question: In 2008, did banks lend money to people who wanted to buy a house because they believed that the value of the housing market would keep rising? So even if people defaulted on their loan repayments then the banks could reposes the house as it was used as collateral. As the value of …

Read more

Shrinkflation definition and examples

toblerone bigger gap

Definition: Shrinkflation occurs when firms reduce the size or quantity of a good and keep prices the same. Shrinkflation is an alternative to increasing prices, and you could argue it is a disguised form of inflation because if you wanted to buy exactly the same quantity of the good, you would have to spend relatively …

Read more

How to increase economic growth

supply-side-policies

Economic growth is an increase in national output/income (higher real GDP).

There are two main aspects of economic growth:

  1. Aggregate demand (AD) (consumer spending, investment levels, government spending, exports-imports)
  2. Aggregate supply (AS) (Productive capacity, the efficiency of economy, labour productivity)

To increase economic growth

We need to see a rise in demand and/or an increase in productive capacity:

1. A rise in aggregate demand

ad-increase

Aggregated demand can increase for various reasons.

  • Lower interest rates – reduce the cost of borrowing and increase consumer spending and investment.
  • Increased real wages – if nominal wages grow above inflation then consumers have more disposable to spend.
  • Higher global growth – leading to increased export spending.
  • Devaluation, making exports cheaper and imports more expensive, increasing domestic demand.
  • Rising wealth, e.g. rising house prices cause consumers to spend more (they feel more confident and can remortgage their house.

Growth in productivity

supply-side-policies

This is growth in aggregate supply (productive capacity). This can occur due to:

  • Development of new technology, e.g. steam power and telegrams helped productivity in the nineteenth century. Internet, AI and computers are helping to increase productivity in the twenty-first century.
  • Introduction of new management techniques, e.g. Better industrial relations helps workers become more productive.
  • Improved skills and qualification.
  • More flexible working practices – working from home, self-employment.
  • Increased net migration – especially encouraging workers with the skills that are in short supply (e.g. builders, fruit pickers)
  • Raise retirement age and therefore increasing the supply of labour.
  • Public sector investment – e.g. improved infrastructure, increased spending on education and

To what extent can the government increase economic growth?

A government can try to influence the rate of economic growth through demand-side and supply-side policies,

  • Expansionary fiscal policy – cutting taxes to increase disposable income and encourage spending. However, lower taxes will increase the budget deficit and will lead to higher borrowing. The expansionary fiscal policy is most appropriate in a recession when there is a fall in consumer spending.
  • Expansionary monetary policy (now usually set by independent Central Bank) – cutting interest rates can boost domestic demand.
  • Stability. A key function of the government is to provide economic and political stability which enables the usual economic activity to take place. Uncertainty and political tension can discourage investment and economic growth.

Government supply-side policies

  • Investment in infrastructure, e.g. new roads, railways lines and broadband internet – increases productive capacity and reduces congestion.
  • Privatisation and deregulation – increase efficiency and productivity.

Factors beyond the government’s influence

  • The rate of technological innovation tends to come from the private sector and it is hard for the government to influence this.
  • Industrial relations and workers motivation are driven by the private sector. The government’s influence on worker morale and motivation is limited at best.
  • Entrepreneurs who set up a business are largely self-motivated. Though government regulations and tax rates can influence the willingness of an entrepreneur’s willingness to take risks.
  • Level of savings can influence growth (e.g. see Harrod-Domar model) Higher savings enable higher investment, but it can be hard for the government to influence savings.
  • Willingness to work. In the post-war period, the defeated countries Germany and Japan saw rapid rates of economic growth – reflecting a determination to rebuild after the war. UK economy had less dynamism – this could reflect different attitudes to work and willingness to introduced new ideas.
  • Global growth exerts a strong influence on any economy. If the world enters a global recession, it is very hard for an individual economy to avoid the costs. For example, the credit crunch of 2009 negatively affected economic growth in OECD economies.

uk-growth-fr-us

US, France and the UK all entered the recession in 2009. However, the better recovery in the US could be due to different policy responses. Expansionary fiscal policy of 2009/10 and a looser monetary policy.

Governments often over-estimate how much they are able to increase productivity growth. Most of the technological progress comes from private sector without government intervention. Supply-side policies can help increase efficiency to some extent, but it is debatable how much they can actually increase growth rates.

For example, after supply-side policies of the 1980s, the government hoped there had been a supply-side miracle which enables a much faster rate of economic growth. However, the Lawson boom of the 80s proved to be unsustainable and the UK growth rate remained pretty much the same at around 2.5% At the very least supply-side policies will take substantial time, e.g. increasing labour productivity through education and training will take several years.

For developing economies with substantial infrastructure failures and lack of basic amenities, there is much greater scope for the government increasing growth rates.  By providing basic levels of education and infrastructure the scope for higher growth rates is much higher.

Most productivity growth is determined by the private sector. With a few exceptions, most technological improvements come from private firms. It is the private sector which develops new technology which enables the vast majority of productivity growth we see in the UK. I’m sceptical of the government’s ability to invest in new technology which would boost this rate of productivity growth. (though it can happen – especially in war)

Economic growth in the UK

Since 1945, the UK economy has grown by an average of 2.5% a year. Most economists would argue that, on average, the UK’s productive capacity can increase by around 2.5% a year. This is known as the ‘trend rate of growth’ or ‘underlying trend rate’.

Note, even when the government tried supply-side policies, they usually failed to shift this long-run trend rate. (e.g. supply-side policies of the 1980s, did little to alter the long-run trend rate)

The graph below shows how actual GDP fell below the trend rate from 2008. This was due to the recession and a significant fall in Aggregate Demand.

real-gdp-trend-actual

Growth in productive capacity (AS) occurs because of:

  • Improved technology developed by the private sector which enables higher labour productivity (e.g. development of computers enables greater productivity)
  • Improved management techniques which enable a more skilled workforce.
  • Improved education and training by both private sector and public sector
  • Investment in infrastructure, e.g. building new roads and train lines. This is mainly the responsibility of the government.

Read more

How Central Banks can act as lender of last resort

eu-bond-yields

A look at how a Central Bank may act as lender of last resort to commercial banks and the government. A lender of last resort means if banks or the government are short of funds, the Central Bank will step into prevent illiquidity. This helps to maintain confidence in the banking sector. Lender of last …

Read more

Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)

Big_Mac_index_50USD_2columns

Purchasing Power Parity PPP is a theory which suggests that exchange rates are in equilibrium when they have the same purchasing power in different countries. Purchasing power parity will involve looking at a basket of goods to determine effective living costs. The purchasing power parity is determined by dividing a basket of goods in one …

Read more

Item added to cart.
0 items - £0.00