Questions on the nature of economics and the importance of money

Several readers questions on the economy, such as different types of economic systems and the role of money and the economy.
jarrow-crusade
Jarrow crusade in the 1930s – resulting from a failure of the economic system and mass unemployment.

 

1. What is an economic system?
An economic system is the general way that an economy is set up. For example, it could be free market (no government intervention) or at the other extreme a Command economy (Communist). In a communist economy the government decides what to produce, how to produce and for whom. In a free market, the economic system leaves it up to individuals and firms to decide what to produce.
2. What are the different types of economic systems?

Free market, | Mixed economies | Command economies

 

3. What is the largest importing country?

US, China (Largest importers)

 

4. What is the largest exporting country?

China $ 2,057bn, then US, Germany and Japan. See CIA databook

 

5. Why is money important for the world?

Money has many functions. See Functions of money Essentially money enables firms and consumers to make transactions. For example, firms pay workers wages. Workers can then use their money to buy goods and services. Using money which is universally accepted is more practical than a barter economy (e.g. swapping a potato for a chicken) Money also enables us to put a value on goods and services and borrow money.

 

6. Why is the economy important for the world?

The economy determines living standards; it determines how much a country can spend on health and education. Countries which experience economic crisis tend to experience political crisis too. e.g mass unemployment can lead to the rise of political extremism. Economic stability can enable a more peaceful world.

 

7. Does money make people greedy?

Money can make people greedy. But, it really depends on the person. If you look at the behaviour of certain monopolists (e.g. capitalist class who paid very low wages to workers and made their workers do long hours in dangerous conditions) it seems some people can become greedy for more money, even if it means reducing the quality of life for the people working for them) But, other business owners, like Robert Owen, put the welfare of his workers above making profits. Even the great US monopolists, like Rockefeller, Carnegie J.P.Morgan and Bill Gates became philanthropists later in life – giving away large parts of their monopoly profit.

Read more

Tax on sugary soft drinks

A few years ago, I looked at the arguments for and against a tax on ‘fatty foods‘. Generally, I supported the idea of a tax on unhealthy foods because it is a way to price the full social cost of the good. It is an example of a Pigovian tax. A tax which internalises the external cost of the good.  Recently, the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges has produced a report stating 10 factors that could help reduce the UK’s obesity epidemic. One of these is an experimental 20% tax on sugary soft drinks.

A new study claims a 20 per cent tax on sugary drinks would reduce the number of obese adults in the UK by 180,000, bring in £276m to the Treasury and save the NHS millions.

The logic behind the new tax.

  • Higher price will reduce demand and make ‘healthier alternatives’ more attractive.
  • Over time, the higher price may change peoples spending and eating habits.
  • The sugary soft drinks create an external cost – of contributing towards obesity. Since obesity has external costs, the tax is making people pay the full social cost. It is the same principle as taxing petrol so people pay the social cost of congestion and pollution.
  • You could also argue sugary soft drinks and other unhealthy foods are a demerit good. People don’t know (or ignore) the damage to health. Making them more expensive discourages the consumption of these demerit goods.
  • If the tax is on volume, it may encourage people to enjoy smaller sizes.  Then people can enjoy without drinking to excess. e.g. the free refill is a popular marketing tool, but encourages consumption to excess. But, could a tax stop free refills?
  • It could raise up to £0.3 billion. This £0.3 billion could be used to lower other taxes, such as VAT or it could be used to increase spending on the NHS or specific obesity units.

Read more

US debt and deficit stats

A selection of graphs and statistics about US Federal debt and the US Federal budget deficit / surplus.

US Federal Deficit since 1946

The federal deficit is the annual difference between federal spending and federal tax revenues. For example, in 2012,

  • Federal receipts (tax e.t.c) were $2,450.2 billion ($2.4 trillion) (15.8% of GDP)
  • Federal spending was $3,537.1 billion (22.8% of GDP),
  • leaving a federal deficit of  $1,087.0 billion ($1.1 trillion) (7.0% of GDP)

budget-deficit-46-13

Source: Whitehouse.gov

 US borrowing during World War Two

Budget deficit % of GDP
1942-14.2
1943-30.3
1944-22.7
1945-21.5
1946-7.2
19471.7

During the Second World War, the deficit reached over 30% of GDP in 1943!

US Federal deficit since 1995

budget-deficit-95-13

The US budget deficit has fallen in 2013 more than initial forecasts. The government says the deficit for the 2013 budget year totaled $680.3 billion, down from $1.09 trillion in 2012. (a fall of 37%. see: Washington Post) The fall in the deficit is due to spending cuts (-2.4%) which took place in March and due to rising tax revenues (+ 13%) from higher economic growth.

The Whitehouse estimate for 2013 was originally 6% of GDP, but the CBO have updated that to a deficit of just 4% of GDP.

 Commentary

The US faced a political battle about raising the debt ceiling. But, recent budget data offers encouraging signs of a reduction in government borrowing. Importantly, the biggest reduction in the federal deficit came from a surge in tax revenues due to economic growth. The biggest challenge facing the US economy is to maintain a strong economic recovery. This will be the best way to continue improve short-term and long-term debt projections.

Given the rate of deficit reduction, there was no economic logic to raise the threat of massive spending cuts, which would only have risked plunging the economy back into recession.

Read more

US economy stats

A short summary of main US economy stats and where to find more detailed stats. Other data GDP: $16.66 trillion (Q-2 2013) GDP per capita $49,601 (2012) 10th, nominal; 6th, PPP Gini coefficient 0.48 (2011) Labor force 155.6 million (11.26 mil. unemployed) Related pages at economicshelp.org History of US national debt Other helpful external links …

Read more

Britain’s recovery – strong or weak?

There are different ways of looking at the UK recovery. Firstly, we can look at the damage done to the economy since the peak in 2008. The black lines suggests a possible pre-crisis trend rate of economic growth. A rough rule of thumb, suggests that had economic growth been maintained at the pre-crisis trend rate …

Read more

Growth of the global tablet market

Back in the summer of 2010, Apple launched the iPad. It was launched to great excitement and it seems the initial euphoria was well placed. From sales of zero at the start of 2010, the tablet market has expanded to over 100 million units a year as we come towards the end of 2013. Sales forecast predict global tablet sales will reach 200 million a year by 2016.

It is an astonishing growth and is changing the way people access information on the internet.

The decline of the traditional computer?

The rapid growth of tablets is bad news for sales of laptop computers and desktops. Laptop sales fell 8.6% in the Q3 2013, and sales of laptops have now fallen for six consecutive quarters; sales have fallen to levels last seen in 2008.

I often ask my students if they use tablets or computers, it is increasingly common for people to say they hardly turn on their computer, but just use tablet or mobile phone. On a personal note, I bought one of the first Ipads but I never really got on with a tablet (I sold it on ebay a few weeks later). Perhaps I am missing something? Though a mac-book air, is closer to a tablet than most laptops.

Apple Market Share of Tablets

Apple is  the leading brand. Despite being the most expensive tablet, it still retains 45% of the market share. However, it has a serious competitor in the Android OS which is fairly close to Apple market share (though split amongst different manufacturers). Apple also has the advantage of being the most profitable, able to charge a higher price than many other tables. Apple benefits from:

  • Being the first mover in the market.
  • Apple compatibility with iPhone and other Apple products
  • Strong brand loyalty
  • Technological advances making it one of the best products.

Why is the price of tablets falling?

tablet-price-1
Source: mobile mag

Since the introduction of the Apple iPad back in 2010 at a price of over $700, the average price of a tablet has been falling quite significantly, and market forecasts suggest it will keep falling. Note, this fall in price has occurred despite the rising demand. Several factors explain this fall in the price of tablets.

  • Price skimming. When Apple launched the product at $700, there was an element of price skimming. Charging a high price to attract those customers willing to high price for a tablet. Since then, many new firms have been seeking to attract a new range of customers more sensitive to price. The price of an iPad could also be described as ‘premium pricing‘ – charging a high price to reinforce the impression Apple is the best quality. Recent tablet models are less keen to claim they are the best quality.

    Read more

Item added to cart.
0 items - £0.00